Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Vol. 12 No. 4 (2021): JGED - December 2021
Original scientific paper

Statistical evaluation of a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW) consistency [4th C of CMW]

Haji Naik Dharavath
Central Connecticut State University, Department of Computer Electronics & Graphics Technology, New Britain, USA

Published 2021-12-01

abstract views: 42 // Full text article (PDF): 57


Keywords

  • calibration,
  • color deviation,
  • solid ink density,
  • control chart,
  • output profile,
  • colorimetry,
  • gamut,
  • screening
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Naik Dharavath, H. (2021). Statistical evaluation of a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW) consistency [4th C of CMW]. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design, 12(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.24867/JGED-2021-4-017

Abstract

The purpose of this applied research was to determine the Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW) consistency (4th C of the color management) over a period of time [100 days, (N = 100)]. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, calibration method, device profile, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), printer resolution and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color printing attributes such as the overall average color deviation [ACD, ΔE (2000)] and the solid ink density (SID) were analyzed to examine the CMDPW process consistency in a day-today digital printing operation. These are the color attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colors of the random sample size (n = 80) were measured against the GRACoL2013 standards to derive the colorimetric/densitometric values. Reference colorimetric values used in the analysis were the threshold deviations (acceptable color deviations) as outlined in the ISO12647-7 standards (GRACoL2013). A control charts analysis was applied for further determining the process (CMDPW) SID and ACD variation. The data collected were run through multiple software applications (MS-Excel/SPSS/Minitab) to apply various statistical methods. Analyzed data from the experiment revealed that the printed colorimetric values were in match (aligned) with the GRACoL 2013 (reference/target). Since the SID values of CMYK colors were in control throughout the process, this enabled the CMDPW to produce consistent acceptable color deviation (Average Printed ΔE (2000) = 2.978; SD = 0.437; Acceptable Threshold color deviation is ΔE (2000) ≤ 3.00).

Article history: Received (April 9, 2021); Revised (August 7, 2021); Accepted (September 22, 2021); Published online (December 1, 2021)

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics