Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

Search
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Forthcoming
Professional paper

Enhancing user experience in online learning environments: Design, evaluation, and usability techniques

Full text article (PDF)
  • Yaw Ofosu-Asare
Yaw Ofosu-Asare
Southern Cross University, New South Wales, Australia

Published 2024-11-19

abstract views: 0 // Full text article (PDF): 0


Keywords

  • Usability evaluation,
  • online learning platforms,
  • design principles,
  • user experience,
  • heuristic evaluation,
  • cognitive walkthroughs,
  • graphical user interface (GUI),
  • learning efficacy,
  • user satisfaction,
  • task success rate
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2024). Enhancing user experience in online learning environments: Design, evaluation, and usability techniques. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design, 45–59. Retrieved from https://jged.uns.ac.rs/index.php/jged/article/view/1478

Abstract

This study aims to enhance user experience on online learning platforms by investigating design principles, usability evaluation techniques, and redesign processes. A total of 150 participants, divided equally among students, educators, and professionals, were stratified by age, gender, education level, and familiarity with online learning. Various evaluation methods, including heuristic evaluation, guideline reviews, and cognitive walkthroughs, were employed. Metrics such as task success rate, time-on-task, and Net Promoter Score (NPS) were used to quantify user satisfaction and effectiveness. Additionally, five qualitative interviews were conducted for deeper insights. The results revealed specific usability issues and demonstrated the effectiveness of the applied evaluation techniques. Post-redesign metrics indicated significant improvements in user satisfaction and engagement. The study underscores the importance of a multi-faceted approach to design and evaluation in online learning platforms and suggests avenues for future research.

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics

Full text article (PDF)

References

  1. Alojaiman, B. (2021) Toward Selection of Trustworthy and Efficient E-Learning Platform. IEEE Access. 9, 133889-133901. Available from:
  2. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114150
  3. Bargas-Avila, J. A. & Hornbæk, K. (2011) Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'11, 7-12 May 2011, Vancouver, Canada. New York, Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 2689 – 2698. Available from: doi: 10.1145/1978942.1979336
  4. Bilgin, A., Hagras, H., Van Helvert, J. & Alghazzawi, D. (2015) A linear general type-2 fuzzy-logic-based computing with words approach for realizing an ambient intelligent platform for cooking recipe recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 24 (2), 306-329. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2453400
  5. Boyd, H. (1998) In Memoriam Dr. John Henrik Clarke (1915-1998). The Black Scholar. 28 (3/4), 50-52.
  6. Demmans Epp, C., Phirangee, K., Hewitt, J. & Perfetti, C. A. (2020) Learning management system and course influences on student actions and learning experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development. 68, 3263-3297. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09821-1
  7. Diaz-Infante, N., Lazar, M., Ram, S. & Ray, A. (2022) Demand for online education is growing. are providers ready?. McKinsey & Company. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/demand-for-online-education-is-growing-are-providers-ready [Accessed 12th June 2023]
  8. Ennouamani, S., Mahani, Z. & Akharraz, L. (2020) A context-aware mobile learning system for adapting learning content and format of presentation: design, validation and evaluation. Education and Information Technologies. 25, 3919-3955. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10149-9
  9. Galić, S., Lušić, Z. & Stanivuk, T. (2020) E-learning in maritime affairs. Journal of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering. 17 (1). Available
  10. from: doi: 10.3329/jname.v17i1.42203
  11. Ivory, M. Y. (2000) Web TANGO: towards automated comparison of information-centric web site designs. In: CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '00, 1-6 April 2000, Hague, Netherlands. New York, Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 239-330. Available from: doi: 10.1145/633292.633491
  12. Kouroupetroglou, G. & Spiliotopoulos, D. (2009) Usability methodologies for real-life voice user interfaces. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE). 4 (4), 78-94. Available from: doi: 10.4018/jitwe.2009100105
  13. Lidwell, W., Holden, K. & Butler, J. (2010) Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Gloucester, Rockport Publishers.
  14. Lu, J., Schmidt, M., Lee, M. & Huang, R. (2022) Usability research in educational technology: A state-ofthe- art systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development. 70 (6), 1951-1992. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10152-6
  15. Maslov, I., Nikou, S. & Hansen, P. (2021) Exploring user experience of learning management system. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 38 (4), 344-363. Available from: doi: 10.1108/IJILT-03-2021-0046
  16. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A. & Moy, P. (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political communication. 16 (3), 315- 336. Available from: doi: 10.1080/105846099198659
  17. Misra, P. (2018) MOOCs for teacher professional development: Reflections and suggested actions. Open Praxis. 10 (1), 67-77. Available from: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.780
  18. Mshigeni, S., Arroyo-Romano, J. & Becerra, M. (2022) “We don’t all have the privilege of having our own quiet place”: College Students in a Hispanic Serving Institution during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Latinos and Education. 21 (3), 251-265. Available from: doi: 10.1080/15348431.2022.2056463.
  19. Nielsen, J. (1994) Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen J., Mack R. L. (eds.) Usability inspection methods. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 25-62.
  20. Nielsen, J. & Molich, R. (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '90, 1-5 April 1990, Seattle, Washington. New York, Association for Computing Machinery. Available from: doi: 10.1145/97243.97281
  21. Norman, D. A. (1988) The psychology of everyday things. New York, Basic books.
  22. Rundo, L., Pirrone, R., Vitabile, S., Sala, E. & Gambino, O. (2020) Recent advances of HCI in decision-making tasks for optimized clinical workflows and precision medicine. Journal of biomedical informatics. 108, 103479. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103479
  23. Sani, A., Wiliani, N. & Husain, T. (2019) Spreadsheet Usability Testing in Nielsen’s Model among Users of ITSMEs to Improve Company Performance. European Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2 (6), 1-9.
  24. Sarrab, M., Elbasir, M. & Alnaeli, S. (2016) Towards a quality model of technical aspects for mobile learning services: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior. 55, 100-112. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.003
  25. Speicher, M. (2021) Conversion rate & average order value are not UX metrics UX is an elusive thing. Medium. Available from: https://uxdesign.cc/conversion-rate-average-order-value-are-not-ux-metrics-
  26. d6e7e40e286 [Accessed 12th June 2023]
  27. Wharton, C. & Lewis, C. (1994) The role of psychological theory in usability inspection methods. In: Nielsen, J. & Mack, R. (eds.) Usability inspection methods. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 341-350.