Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut ero labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

Search
GUIDE FOR AUTHORS SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Forthcoming
Original scientific paper

Design of thermoformed plastic container using mould from three-dimensional printing for pear protective performance

Full text article (PDF)
  • Nilmanee Somporn,
  • Ludd Meechai,
  • Juntiya Vorachet
Nilmanee Somporn
Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Program of Packaging and Material Technology, Center of Excellence in Bio-Based Materials and Packaging Innovation, Hat Yai, Thailand
Ludd Meechai
King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Faculty of Digital Agro-Industry, Program of Food Technology and Supply Chain Management, Bangkok, Thailand
Juntiya Vorachet
Mae Fah Luang University, School of Health Science, Program of Sports and Health Science, Chiang Rai, Thailand

Published 2025-12-23

abstract views: 0 // Full text article (PDF): 0


Keywords

  • three-dimension printing,
  • thermoforming container,
  • packaging design

How to Cite

Somporn, N., Meechai, L., & Vorachet, J. (2025). Design of thermoformed plastic container using mould from three-dimensional printing for pear protective performance. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. Retrieved from https://jged.uns.ac.rs/index.php/jged/article/view/2168

Copyright (c) 2026 © 2026 Authors. Published by the University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Graphic Engineering and Design. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 Serbia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Thermoforming is a widely used plastic packaging method due to its affordability, high protective performance, and ability to prevent mechanical damage to fruits during transportation. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the thermoforming packaging moulding process, evaluate the structural strength of thermoformed packaging, and assess the effectiveness of various shaped thermoformed containers in protecting pears. The prototype design was based on different geometric shapes and dimensions, divided into four relief geometries: cylindrical (M1), semi-circular (M2), geodesic dome (M3), square (M4), and commercial dome shapes. According to the mould thermoforming process, the mockups of each pattern were modelled using SolidWorks software and formed using a 3D printer. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic sheets were formed in a container mould with a thermoformed machine under the same parameter conditions of time, temperature, and pressure. The compression resistance of the thermoformed containers was tested. According to these findings, the compression force was higher in inferior thermoformed containers than in superior thermoformed containers. This is due to the relief size, geometry, and dimensions of the thermoformed containers. Then, thermoformed containers were employed to perform the dart drop impact test, with the pears dropped from heights of 20, 40, and 60 cm. The thermoformed container sample with a square shape (M4) had the lowest proportion of bruises (8.33%) on fruit. For container sample M4, the bruised area (BA) was assessed at drop heights of 20, 40, and 60 cm at 97.12, 140.75, and 206.02 square millimeters, respectively. Based on this finding, the bruise volume increased as the impact height increased. Additionally, a drop test was performed at a height of 90 cm using a thermoformed container with pears in a double-wall corrugated board for the BC flute. A higher total area of bruises on pears without thermoformed containers was observed in the evaluation of bruised damage. Therefore, this study concludes that the shape, size, and relief position of thermoformed containers reduce the damage caused by the compression strength and dropping height during transportation.

PlumX Metrics

Dimensions Citation Metrics

Full text article (PDF)

References

  1. Afshariantorghabeh, S., Kırki, T. & Leminen, V. (2022) Three-dimension forming of plastic-coated fibrebased materials using a thermoforming process. Packaging Technology and Science. 35 (7), 543–555. Available from: doi: 10.1002/pts.2650
  2. Azam, M. M., Saad, A. & Amer, B. M. A. (2022) Assessment of the quality losses of cantaloupe fruit during transportation. Processes. 10 (6), 1187. Available from: doi: 10.3390/pr10061187
  3. Chantarapanich, N., Vakeeprakhon, T., Wanchat, S. & Veerasakul, M. S. (2020) Design of plastic medical tray: a case study of orthopaedic implant packaging. Suan Sunandha Science and Technology Journal. 7 (2), 49–53. Available from: doi: 10.14456/ssstj.2020.15
  4. Günther, D., Erhard, P., Schwab, S. & Taha, I. (2021) 3D printed sand tools for thermoforming application of carbon fiber reinforced composites – a perspective. Materials. 14 (16), 4639. Available from: doi: 10.3390/ma14164639
  5. Ibrahim, S. & Fahmy, H. (2021) The structural design of 3D printed bottle prototype using a PLA-based eco-friendly polymer packaging material. International
  6. Design Journal. 11 (4), 321–331. Available from: doi: 10.21608/idj.2021.180941
  7. Lin, M., Chen, J. F. K., Zhu, C., Wu, D. & Wang, J. (2020) Effects of cushioning materials and temperature on quality damage of ripe peaches according to the vibration test. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 25, 100518. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100518
  8. Nilmanee, S. (2023) Developing prototypes of the assistant opener of packaging for consumer accessibility. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design. 14 (3), 27–36. Available from: doi: 10.24867/JGED-2023-3-027
  9. Pathare, P. B. & Al-Dairi, M. (2021) Bruise susceptibility and impact on quality parameters of pears during storage. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 5, 1–13. Available from: doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.658132
  10. Robertson, G. L. (2013) Food Packaging: Principles and Practice. Boca Raton, CRC Press.
  11. Rodríguez-Parada, L., Mayuet, P. F. & Gamez, A. J. (2019a) Custom design of packaging through advanced technologies: a case study applied to apples. Materials. 12 (3), 467. Available from: doi: 10.3390/ma12030467
  12. Rodríguez-Parada, L., Mayuet, P. F. & Gamez, A. J. (2019b) Evaluation of reliefs’ properties on design of thermoformed packaging using fused deposition modelling moulds. Materials. 12 (3), 478. Available from: doi: 10.3390/ma12030478
  13. Selke, S. E. M. & Culter, J. D. (2016) Plastics Packaging: Properties, Processing, Application, and Regulation. 3rd ed. Munich, Hanser Publishers.
  14. Soroka, W. (2009) Fundamentals of Packaging Technology. 4th ed. Illinois, Institute of Packaging Professionals.
  15. Tuhin, M. O., Cheng, K., Naveed, M., Aliakbarian, B. & Babnawaz, M. (2021) A dual-wall 3D-printed anti-tampering medical bottle. Journal of Packaging Technology and Research. 5, 89–95. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s41783-021-00113-4
  16. Xia, M., Zhao, X., Wei, X. X., Guan, W., Xu, C. & Mao, L. (2020) Impact of packaging materials on bruise damage in kiwifruit during free-drop test. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 42, 119. Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11738-020-03081-5